Skip to content

Independent advisers

Bring the right expertise
into review.

A clear record makes professional help easier to scope.

Choose counsel for legal interpretation, privacy specialists for data use, and technical owners for delivery. Match the help to the question and jurisdiction.

The working split

Three different jobs.

  1. Your organisation

    Supplies the facts, chooses its reviewers and owns the decision and implementation.

    The compliance conclusion stays with you.

  2. Your adviser

    Interprets requirements, examines the evidence and owns their professional advice.

    Agree scope, fees and conflicts directly.

  3. Andes

    Provides Calibre and the agreed product and delivery information for your review.

    Product support is not legal advice.

By jurisdiction

Independent firms

Confirm jurisdiction, scope, language, availability, fees and conflicts with the firm.

No Andes partnership or endorsement is confirmed for these firms. Practice summaries link to their official pages, checked on 2 October 2026.

Norway
  • Norway / Independent firm

    Thommessen

    AI governance, digital regulation, data and intellectual property, AI contracts and security.

    A question to bring: What should our AI-use policy and supplier contract cover for the use we have recorded?

    Read the official practice page
  • Norway / Independent firm

    Wikborg Rein

    Technology procurement, privacy, information security, outsourcing and technology transfer.

    A question to bring: How should we assess the privacy and contractual responsibilities in procuring this tool?

    Read the official practice page
Ireland
  • Ireland / Independent firm

    Mason Hayes & Curran

    AI adoption and licensing, provider terms, privacy and security, and EU AI Act questions.

    A question to bring: What do our proposed AI use and provider terms mean for our responsibilities?

    Read the official practice page

A note from the founder

Good governance needs practitioners.

I built Calibre to give legal, risk and technology practitioners a clearer starting point for review. Their expertise stays central. The product supports their judgement; it does not replace it.

If you work in practice, research or a governance body, I'd welcome a conversation about how we can make this more useful together.

Andres Urzua

Founder, Andes